Spinoza

• Spinoza (1632-77) is known to be the noblest and most lovable of all the great philosophers. He was born a Jew but his whole philosophy is dominated by the idea of god. His family went to Holland from Spain or maybe Portugal, to escape the Inquisition. He firstly in Amsterdam and then Hague, earning a living by polishing lenses. At the early age of 44 he died of Phthisis.
• His chief work was the Ethics, however he did write two other books, the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, which is a combination of biblical criticism and political theory. The other was  the Tractatus Politicus, which deals with political theory only.
• Spinoza's political theory is mainly derived from Hobbes. He states that in a state of nature, there is no right or wrong because wrong consists of disobeying the law. He holds that the sovereign can do no wrong and that the church should be entirely subordinate to State. He is opposed to all types of rebellion, even against a bad government.
• Spinoza's Ethics deals with three main matters. It begins with metaphysics; it the goes on to the psychology of the passions and the will; and finally it sets forth an ethic based on the preceding metaphysics and psychology.
• For Spinoza, he believed that for him, thought and extension were both attributes of god. He also believed that there can only be one being who is wholly positive and he must be absolutely infinite. Which leads him to believe that everything that happens is a manifestation of God's inscrutable nature and that it is logically impossible that events should be other that they are. This leads to sin where according to Spinoza, everything is decreed by God and therefore is good.
• Spinoza believed in a theory that the human mind has an adequate knowledge of the eternal and infinite essence of God. He also stated that 'The mind's highest good is the knowledge of God, and the mind's highest virtue is to know God'.
• Like Socrates and Plato, Spinoza believed that all wrong action sis due to intellectual error.
• According to Spinoza's (irrational and ignorant thinking) 'whatever happens is part of the eternal timeless world as God sees it; to him the date is irrelevant'. Also ' only ignorance makes us think that we can alter the future; what will be will be, and the future is as unalterably fixed as the past. that is why hope and fear are condemned: both depend upon viewing the future as uncertain, and therefore spring from lack of wisdom'.
• Spinoza also believed that there is no evil, because God has no knowledge of evil, because there is no evil to be known.
• Spinoza's outlook is intended to liberate men from the tyranny of fear. His wisdom was that free men didn't think of death, but only of life. He lived up to these words because on the day he died, he was said to be completely calm and spoke of every day matters that interested him as if it was a normal day. 

Spinoza



• Spinoza spoke about emotions a lot and emotions in relation to God. Below are some directs quotes from 'Russell's History of Western philosophy' on Spinoza and emotions.
• Understanding that all things are necessary helps the mind to acquire power over the emotions. 'He who clearly and distinctly understands himself and his emotions, loves God, and so much the more as he more understands himself and his emotions'.
• All joy in true thought is part of the intellectual love of god, for it contains nothing negative, and is therefore truly part of the whole, not only apparently, as are fragmentary things so separated in thought as to appear bad'.
• 'Everything is part of God. This understanding of everything as part of God is love of God. When all objects are referred to God, the idea of God will fully occupy the mind'. Thus the statement that 'Love of God must hold the chief place in the mind'.
• Lastly Spinoza says that a man who loves God cannot want God to love him because God loves and hates no one. This leads to the quote 'a man who loved God and wished God to love him would be wishing to feel pain, which is absurd'.
• My opinion is that Spinoza is very ignorant to think these things and to hold these believes. With me being an Atheist, I cant stand people like Spinoza who solely believe that God is the answer to every question that could be possibly asked. When I was reading chapter 10 of 'Russell A Western Philosophy' I couldn't believe how many times I saw the word God in one chapter, I mean its just ridiculous. The only two ideas that I could possibly agree on is when he says that free men don't think of death but only of life. Also that he believes 'revenge is a dangerous motive' and that 'life dominated by a single passion is a narrow life'. Even though he got the latter idea from the bible quote 'Love your enemies'.

Descartes

• Rene Descartes (1596-1650) is widely known to be the founder of modern philosophy.
• Descartes's father was a councillor of the parliament of Brittany and possessed a moderate amount of landed property. When Descartes father died, he inherited his land and sold his estates and invested his money, obtaining six or seven thousand Francs a year.
• From 1604 to 1612, he was educated at the Jesuit college of La Fleche and enlisted in the Dutch army in (1617). Then in 1619 he enlisted in the Bavarian army. He was also a sincere Catholic.
• In 1621 he gave up fighting in the army after a visit to Italy. He then settled in Paris in 1625, but in 1628 he rejoined the army. When this episode was finished, he decided to live in Holland. This was probably to escape persecution.
• He lived in Holland for 20 years, from 1629 to 1649, except from a few brief visits to France and one to England, both were for business. One of the main reasons why Descartes moved to Holland, was because it was the one country that had freedom of speculation in the 17th century. This is also why many philosophers who wrote controversial books, went to Holland to get them printed. Such as Lock and Spinoza. But even in Holland, Descartes was subject to vexatious attacks by the Protestants. Because it was said that his views led to atheism, he would have been prosecuted if it wasn't for the intervention from the ambassador of France and the Prince of Orange. With this attack having failed, another  less direct attack was made on him a few years later, by the the authorities of the University of Leyden, which forbade any mention of him. But yet again the Prince of Orange intervened and told the University to stop being silly.



Rene Descartes

• Queen Christina of Sweden, thought that because she was a sovereign, she had the right to waste the time of great men. So because she was a big fan of Descartes, she wanted daily sessions from him. But because she was so busy, the only time of day that she could spare was five in the morning. With Descartes being a man who didn't like to wake up before midday, he was unaccustomed to this early rising in the cold of a Scandinavian winter and therefore couldn't uphold these daily sessions.
• Descartes fell ill and died in February, 1650. He never married, but he had a daughter who died at the age of five. Its been known, that Descartes said that the passing of his daughter was the greatest sorrow of his life. Descartes was always well dressed and always wore a sword.
• Descartes was a philosopher, a mathematician and a man of Science. His great contribution to geometry was the invention of co-ordinate geometry, although not quite in its final form.
• The book in which he set forth most of his scientific theories was Principia Philosophiae, which was published in 1644. The two most important books that Descartes has written from a philosophical stand point are the Discourse on method (1637) and the Meditations (1642).
• In these books, Descartes begins by explaining the method of 'Cartesian doubt'. The method of 'Cartesian doubt' is basically to help Descartes have a firm basis for his philosophy. In order for him to achieve this he resolves to make himself doubt everything that he can manage to doubt. Knowing that this process could take some time, he decided to remove everything from his mind that he could possibly doubt in relation to his practice. He began with scepticism in regard to the senses. 'I can doubt', he says 'that I am sitting here by the fire in a dressing-gown ? yes, for sometimes I have dreamt that I was here when in fact I was naked in bed'. He then proceeds to discuss how he thinks that there might be a powerful demon misleading him and that if there is such a demon, it might be that all things that he sees are only are illusion of which the demon makes use as traps for Descartes credulity. In order for Descartes to overcome these thoughts, he then went on to say one of the most famous philosophical quotes of his time, which was 'There remains, however, something that I cannot doubt: no demon, however cunning, could deceive me if I did not exist. I may have no body : this might be an illusion. But thought is different, While I wanted to think everything false, it must necessarily be that I who thought was something; and remarking that this truth, I think, therefore I am'. Once Descartes established  this quote, he had set a firm foundation from which he could rebuild his knowledge from. He had established that the only thing he knew was real, was his mind. ' The I that has been proved to exist has been inferred from the fact that I think, therefore I exist while I think, and only then. If I ceased to think, there would be no evidence of my existence. I am a thing that thinks, a substance of which the whole nature or essence consists in thinking, and which needs no place or material thing for its existence. The soul, therefore, is wholly distinct from the body and easier to know than the body; it would be what it is even if there were no body.'
• He also believed that Knowledge of external things must be by the mind, not by the senses.
• Descartes believed that because god is good, god wouldn't act deceitful like the demon which he has previously mentioned. Therefore he believed that because god gave him an inclination to believe in bodies, bodies must therefore exist. He also believed that god gave him the faculty to correct errors, therefore, he uses this faculty to employ that whatever is clear and distinct, must be true. Which enables him to know mathematics and physics.
• In the Meditations there was a discussion as to why the mind feels 'sorrow' when the body is thirsty. The Cartesian answer to this, was, the body and mind were like two clocks, that when one indicated 'thirst' the other indicated 'sorrow'.

Seminar Paper on Swifts, A Modest Proposal

• I would just like to say that I wrote this seminar paper as i was reading it.
• Firstly Swift talks about beggars crowding the cabin doors followed by 3,4,5 or 6 children behind, all in rags and begging every passenger. Beggars are known to be of the female sex.
• Instead of the mothers working they choose to beg, and there children grow up to turn thieves or leave their native country, to fight the pretender in Spain, or sell themselves to the Barbadoes.
• 'As instead of being a charge upon their parents, or the parish, or wanting food and raiment for the rest of their lives, they shall, on the contrary, contribute to the feeding, and partly to the clothing of many thousands.' From this quote I think Jonathan Swift is trying to say that after the 1st year of the beggars child's life, instead of them becoming a burden on their mother and the public, that he should make good use of them. (But it is not clear to me how he tends on doing that yet).
• Swift believes that the advantages to his scheme will prevent women from aborting and murdering there children.
• He believes there remain 120,000children who are annually born of poor parents. He asks 'how will this number be provided for?'
• He he basically then goes on to say that the reason why its hard to provide for these kids is because they have no skill so therefore you cant employ them. He uses the example of not being able to employ them in handicraft or agriculture. He says the only skill they have, are as thieves.
• Swift then says ' that a young child well nursed, is, at a year old, a most delicious nourishing and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled;' At this point it becomes clear that his proposal is to cook and perform acts of mass cannibalism on these children.
• He then says ' that of the 120,000 children, already computed, 20,000 may be reserved for breed', he also says 'that these children are seldom the fruits of marriage'. And 'one male will be sufficient to serve four females'.
• He then proposes that ,the remaining 100,000 may, at a year old, be offered in sale to the persons of quality and fortune, through the Kingdom, always advising the mother to let them suck plentiful in the last month, so as to render them plump, and fat for a good table.
• At this point I'm finding the reading extremely funny, simply because of how ludicrous his proposal is and just the thought he comes across as being dead serious. Especially when he starts talking about how a child would make two dishes at an entertainment for friends and also when he talks about seasoning them with a little salt and pepper, then eating them on the fourth day, especially in winter. Although I do believe that Swift is a satirist writer.  
• He then talks about when a child is born, they should weigh 12puonds, but after a year should weigh 28 pounds.
• He also talks about there being more children born in roman catholic countries.
• Swift also thought about how much it would cost to nurse a beggars child, which he thinks it will be two shillings per annum T me this shows that he has really thought through all areas of his proposal.

Not the original cover, but probably the best.

• He then goes on to say that a good fat child cost 10 shillings and that the mother could make a good profit of 8 shillings. By Swift saying this, he is trying to let the mothers know that there is money to be made. It almost sounds as if Swift is trying to make his proposal turn into a business. ( It sounds like a business proposal to me ).
• He then says 'those who are more thrifty ( as i must confess the times require ) may flea the carcass; the skin of which, artificially dressed, will make admirable gloves for ladies, and Summer boots for fine gentlemen'. At this point it sounds more like a business proposal, because it seems like Swift is trying to draw in more people to his proposal by coming up with more than one suggestion for why the publick should kill these children.
• Swift suggests buying the children alive, and 'dressing them hot from the knife, as we do roasting pigs'. Its almost as if he doesn't see these children as human, but more like animal.
• Swift claims that his American friend who gave him this idea, was given it after conversing with a famous salmanaazor, who is a native of the island Formosa. This friend told him that they eat children, who happened to be put to death. To me it seems as if Swift uses this story as an excuse to make it come across to the publick that his proposal is perfectly normal and that people actually perform these acts of cannibalism in other countries.
• When Swift refers to the 'Kingdom', he's talking about Ireland.  
• Swift proceeds to state all the reasons why his Proposal would be beneficial to the publick. He says 'Wheareas the maintenance of 100,000 children, from two years old, and upwards, cannot be computed at less than 10 shillings a piece per annum, the nations stock will be thereby increased £50,000 per annum'. By him saying this, its as if he's trying to make it seem like it will be beneficial for Ireland's economy.
• Towards the end, Swift states ' I can think of no one objection, that will possibly be raised against this proposal, unless it should be argued, that the number of people will be thereby much lessoned in the kingdom'. From this, its as if he's very confident in his proposal.
• Lastly, in the last paragraph, he states ' I progress, in the sincerity of my heart, that I have not the least personal interest in endeavouring to promote this necessary work, having no other motive than the publick good of my country, and giving some pleasure to the rich. I have no children, by which I can propose to get a single penny; the youngest being nine years old, and my wife past child-bearing'.
• From this quote, to me, Swift is trying to make it sound as if he's not proposing it for personal reasons, but just in order to better his country. He also starts to sound very patriotic, because he keeps on referring to Ireland as 'the Kingdom' and he also says 'my country' and 'our country' very often.

• My brief overview of the Modest Proposal, is that I found the essay very entertaining and funny. I'm not sure how the Irish public took it back in 1729, but I would imagine that the uneducated members of the public, may have not seen this essay as satire and could of took it seriously. The reason I think this is because people in those days believed in much more far fetched things than mass cannibalism, so I believe that this essay could of been a disaster. From this video that I found on YouTube, it's probably right to say that you could see how Swift's Proposal can be made modern, but yet still entertaining and hilarious.
• Points Of Discussion.....
• In general what do you think of Swifts Proposal ?
• Do you think his being serious ? If no, why not ?
• What do you think people in 18th century Ireland thought about his Proposal ?
• What do you think his real motives where behind his Proposal ? Do you think they where what he said they where, as stated in the last paragraph ? 

Hobbes's Leviathan

• Hobbes (1588-1679) was an admirer of mathematical method. His Father was a vicar, who was ill- tempered and uneducated; he lost his job by arguing with a neighbouring vicar at the church door. After this, Hobbes, was brought up by his uncle.
•  At the age of 15 Hobbes, went to Oxford, where they taught him scholastic logic and the philosophy of Aristotle.
• In the year of 1610, when he was 22 years old, he became a tutor to Lord Hardwick. It was at this time that he became to know the work of Galileo and Kepler, which profoundly influenced him.
• After the death of the Earl of Devonshire, Hobbes then lived in Paris for a short time. He then became a tutor to the son that the Earl of Devonshire left behind. He travelled to Italy with his pupil where he visited Galileo in 1636. A year later he came back to England.
• From 1646 to 1648, he taught mathematics to Charles II. Then in 1651 he went on to publish the Leviathan, which pleased no one. The books bitter attack on the Catholic Church offended the French Government, which made Hobbes to flee secretly to London.

Hobbes Leviathan book cover

• After the plague and the great fire, when peoples superstitious fears were aroused, the house of commons appointed a committee to inquire into atheistical writings, especially those of Hobbes. From this point onwards, he was not allowed to print anything on controversial subjects in England.
• Below are some of the controversial philosophical ideas that Hobbes believed in and wrote about in his Leviathan book.
• Hobbes believed that all men are naturally equal. In the state of nature, before there was any government, every man desires to preserve his own liberty, but to acquire dominion over others; both these desires are dictated by the impulse of self-preservation. From this he believes that from their conflict there will arise a war of all against all, which makes life 'nasty, brutish and short'. In a state of nature, there is no property, no justice or injustice; there is only war. The second part tells how men escape from these evils by combining into communities, with each subject to a central authority. This is represented as happening by means of social contract. It is thought that a number of people come together and agree to choose a sovereign, or a sovereign authority, which shall gain authority over them and put an end to universal war.
• Hobbes asks the question, why men can't co-operate like ants and bees. He states ' Bees in the same hive, do not compete; they have no desire for honour; and they do not have reason to criticize the government. Their agreement is natural, but that of men can only be artificial, by covenant. The covenant must confer power on one man or one assembly, since otherwise it cannot be enforced'. The government is chosen by the majority of citizens, once the government is chosen and takes power, the citizens loose all rights to the government except when the government find it expedient to grant. Also there is no right to rebel because the ruler is not bound by any contract, whereas the subjects are.
• A multitude so united is called a commonwealth. This 'Leviathan' is a mortal god.
• Hobbes preferred monarchy, he could tolerate parliament alone, but not in a system where the power is shared between King and Parliament.
• Hobbes believed that the English civil war occurred because power was divided between King, Lords and Commons.
• The supreme power , whether a man or an assembly, is called the Sovereign. In Hobbes system the powers of the Sovereign are unlimited. He has the right of censorship over all expression of opinion.The laws of property are to be entirely subject to the Sovereign. Rebellion is wrong, both because it usually fails and because if it succeeds, it sets a bad example and teaches others to rebel.
• In Hobbes system, the succession of the Sovereign is to be determined by the Sovereign himself. Which would usually be one of his children, or a near relative if he has no children himself. But it is held that there is no law that prevents the Sovereign from choosing otherwise.
• On the grounds of self-preservation ( though with limitation ) Hobbes holds that a man has a right to refuse to fight when called upon by the government to do so. Hobbes also believes that resistance against the sovereign is only justified in self defence; resistance in defence of another is always culpable. All teachers are to ministers of the sovereign and should only teach what the sovereign thinks is necessary. The sovereign also has the right to regulate foreign trade and the right to punish comes from him, not from any other forms of justice.
• Hobbes thinks that there should be no difficulty in teaching people in the rights of the sovereign, for they have not been taught to believe in Christianity. 
•  I think that Hobbes is very clear in what he believes in and he is not trying to trick anyone into believing in his concepts. I think he's got the best interest of the citizens at heart, although I must say that I don't believe his political ideas of the sovereign or the government. Mainly because, even though he says that the citizens choose by majority, the sovereign, he's not taking into account every citizen. He's only talking about people of high social status. Also because Hobbes believes that the sovereign has the right to choose his successor, that would mean, the public would only have the right to choose the first ever sovereign, but not any other. Which I believe will eventually lead to a dictatorship.

Francis Bacon

• Francis Bacon (1561-1626) was the son of Sir Nicholas Bacon, who was a Lord keeper of the great Seal.
• Francis Bacon entered Parliament when he was 23 and became advisor to Essex.
• When Essex fell from favour with Parliament, Bacon helped in his prosecution. Bacon was blamed for his treachery and ingratitude towards Essex by some, but this was quite unjust because he worked with Essex while Essex was a noble man, but then abandoned him when continued loyalty to him would have been treasonable. 
• In 1618 Bacon became Lord chancellor, he held this position for two years, then he was prosecuted for accepting bribes from Litigants. For this he was fined £40,000, imprisonment in the tower, perpetual banishment from court and inability to hold office. This sentence was only partially executed because he was not made to pay the fine, was only kept in the tower for four days, but he was compelled to abandon public life and was ordered to spend the rest of his days writing important books.

Francis Bacon

• After five years in retirement, he died from a chill, whilst experimenting on refrigeration by stuffing a chicken with snow.
• Bacon's most important book is The advancement of learning and he is widely known as the originator of the saying 'knowledge is power'.
• He believed that philosophy should be kept separate from theology and shouldn't be intimately blended with it as in scholasticism.
• Bacon was the first of a long line of scientific minded  philosophers  who have emphasised the importance of induction as opposed to deduction. He wished to discover the nature of heat, which he rightly supposed to consist of rapid irregular motions of the small parts of bodies. His method was to make a list of hot bodies, a list of cold bodies and a list of bodies of varying degrees of heat. He hoped that these lists would show certain characteristics always present in hot bodies but absent in cold bodies, and present in varying degrees in bodies of different degrees of heat.
• One or the most famous parts of Bacon's philosophy is his enumeration of what he calls 'idols'. By this he means bad habits of the mind that cause people to fall into error.
• My opinion is that, in terms of Bacon's scientific and philosophical  discoveries, his role in philosophy is very small. Although the few things he did discover are very impressive and it seems to me that he would more be seen as a noble man because of his work in parliament. Even though he did except a bribe, but back in those days it seems as if taking bribes were a common occurrence, it was just unfortunate that he got caught. Also I can see how his political life could be relevant to the history of journalism.

The Rise Of Science

• Decartes, in a sense was the founder of modern Philosophy & was also one of the creators of 17th century Science.
• Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo and Newton are pre-eminent in the creation of Science.
• Copernicus (1473-1543) was a Polish ecclesiastic. In 1500 he had a lectureship or professorship of mathematics in Rome.
• Copernicus believed that the sun is at the centre of the universe. His chief work, De Revoltionibus Oribium Coelestium, was published in the year of his death (1543). The book I believe, was dedicated to the Pope. 
•  Another Astronomer of importance was Tycho Brathe (1546-1601). He believed that the Sun and Moon go around the Earth, but the planets go around the Sun.
• Kepler (1571-1630) is one of the most notable examples of what can be achieved by patience without much in the way of Genius. He was the 1st important Astronomer after Copernicus to adopt the heliocentric theory.
• Kepler's most noticable achievment was the discovery of his three laws of planetery motion.Two of these he published in 1609, the third in 1619.
• His first law states: The planets describe elliptic orbits, of which the sun occupies one focus.
• His second law states: The line joining a planet to the sun sweeps out equal areas in equal times.
• His third law states: The square of the period of revolution of a planet is proportional to the cube of its average distance from the sun.
• Galileo (1564-1642) is considered to be the greatest of the founders of modern Science.
• He was born on about the day in  which Michelangelo died, and he died in the year in which newton was born.
• Galileo first discovered the importance of acceleration in dynamics. he believed that every body, if left alone, Will continue to move in a straight line with uniform velocity; any change, either in the rapidity or the direction of motion, requires to be explained as due to the action of some 'force'.
• Galileo was also the first to discover the law of falling bodies. He also studied projectiles, Which was a subject of importance to his employer, the duke of Tuscany. Galileo showed that if a projectile was to be fired horizontally, apart from the air, the horizontal velocity would be added, which would grow according to the law of intertia. But a vertical velocity would be added, which would grow according to the law of falling bodies.
• Galileo, having found out that a Dutchman invented a telescope, he then made one himself. He then went on to discover some important things. He found that the Milky way consists of a multitude of separate stars, he also observed the phases of Venus and also discovered the satellites of Jupiter.
• Newton (1642-1727) showed that acceleration towards the earth and sun, following the same formula as the laws of motion, explains the moon's motion, and that the acceleration of falling bodies on the earth's surface is again related to that of the moon according to the inverse square law.
• According to Newton, the planets were originally hurled by the hand of God. But when he had done this, decreed the law of gravitation, everything went on by itself without further need of divine intervention.  
• The compound microscope was invented just before the 17th century, around 1590.

One of the first compound microscopes (I think)

The telescope was invented in 1608, by a Dutchman named Lippershy. Galileo also invented the thermometer. Torricelli invented the barometer. Guericke (1602-86) invented the air pump.

One of the first Telescopes

• Gilbert (1540-1603) published his book on the magnet in 1600. Harvey (1578-1657) discovered the circulation of the blood, he published his discovery in 1628. Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) discovered spermatozoa, although it was another man, Stephen Hamn, had discovered them a few months earlier; Leeuwenhoek also discovered protozoa or unicellular organisms and even bacteria. 
• As we are able to tell from all these discoveries, the 17th century was really instrumental for Science, and in many respects, was when Science and astronomy really became significant.

The Reformation & Counter-Reformation

• The Reformation & Counter-Reformation, represent the rebellion of the less civilized nations against the intellectual domination of Italy.
• In the Counter-Reformation there was only revolt against the intellectual & moral freedom of renaissance Italy.
• In the Reformation, the revolt  was political & theological.
• The Reformation was German & the Counter-Reformation was Spanish.
• The three great men of the Reformation & Counter-Reformation are Luther, Calvin & Loyola.
• Luther & Calvin's theology was to diminish the power of the church.
• Loyola created the Jesuit order
• Loyola was a soldier & his order was founded on military models such as: there must be unquestioning obedience to the general, & every Jesuit was to consider himself engaged in warfare against heresy.
• The Jesuit's were disciplined, able, completely devoted to the cause, skillful propagandists & they believed in free will.
• The Jesuit's concentrated on education, & acquired a firm hold on the minds of the young.Whenever theology didn't interfere, the education they gave was the best obtainable. They taught Descartes more Mathematics than he would of learnt elsewhere.

Sir Thomas More

• Sir Thomas More (1478-1535)
• At Oxford he set to learn Greek, The authorities & his father objected, & he was removed from the University.
• His Father was a lawyer & he decided to follow his fathers profession.
• In  1504 he became a member of Parliament. He led the opposition to Henry VII's demand for new taxes. In this he was successful, but the king was furious. He sent More's father to the Tower, however releasing him on a payment of £100.
•  When king Henry VII died in 1509, More returned to his practise of law & won the favour of Henry VIII. He was knighted in 1514. The King also appointed More to be Chancellor in his stead.
• More soon fell into disfavour with the King because the King wanted to divorce Cathrine of Aragon, in  order to marry Anne Boleyn. More opposed the divorce, he therefore resigned in 1532. The King then went on to invite More to his wedding with Anne Boleyn, but More refused the invitation.
• It was proved, however, by very dubious testimony, that More had said Parliament could not make Henry the VIII head of the Church; on this evidence More was convicted of high treason, & beheaded.
• His property was given to Princess Elizabeth, who kept it to the day of her death.
• More is almost Solely remembered on his account of his Utopia (1518).
• Utopia is an island in the southern hemisphere, where everything is done in the best possible way. It was accidentally visited by a sailor named Raphael Hythloday, who spent five years there.
• Before I continue with my notes on Mores Utopia, I would just like to say that at the moment I cant see how some of this philosophy stuff relates to Journalism. I understand that the political side of things could be related to journalism e.g Machiavelli, Sir Thomas More & Hobbes. But as for the others I cant see the relation yet. But nether the less I have to admit that I do find all of what I have read extremely interesting so far. Previous to this Module I have never done Philosophy before, but I am very happy that I have now because I find it very interesting. Which brings me to my next point, I have always heard about Utopia, but  I never new what it was exactly. So when I read chapter 4 I was intrigued by all of the rules & regulations. I will now proceed to write the rules & regulations of Utopia, as it is in the book Just because I personally find it interesting.
• There are 54 towns in Utopia, all on the same plan, except that one is the Capital. All of the streets are twenty feet broad, & all the private houses are exactly alike, with one door onto the street & one onto the garden. There are no locks on the doors, & every one may enter any house. The roofs are flat. Every tenth year people change houses-apparently to prevent any feeling of ownership. In the country, there are farms, each containing not fewer than forty persons, including two bondmen; each farm is under the rule of a Master & Mistress, who are old & wise. The chickens are not hatched by hens, but in incubators (which did not exist in More's time). All are dressed alike, except that there is a difference in dress between men & Women, & married & unmarried. The fashions never change, & no difference is made between Summer & Winter clothes. At work leather or skins are worn; a suit will last seven years. When they stop work, they throw a woolen cloak over their working clothes. All these cloaks are alike & are the natural colour of wool. Each family makes its own clothes. Everybody-men & women alike- works six hours a day, three before dinner & three after. All go to bed at eight, & sleep eight. In the early morning there are lectures, to which multitudes go, although they are not compulsory. After super an hour is dedicated to play. Six hours' work is enough, because there are no idlers & there is no useless work.
• At the head is a prince who is elected for life, but can be deposed for tyranny. Family life is patriachal; married sons live in their fathers house, & are governed by him, unless he is in his dotage. If any family grows to large, the surplus children are moved into another family. If a town grows to large, some of the inhabitants are moved into another town. if all the towns are too large, a new town is built on waste land. All killing of beasts for food is done by bondmen, lest free citizens should learn cruelty. There are hospitals for the sick, which are so excellent that people who are ill prefer them.Eating at home is permitted, but most people eat in common halls. 
• Everything that I have written above in italics, I have extracted from page 478 of chapter 4. I have put this on my blog for the people that may have not read this chapter. If you find it as interesting as I do, please read the rest of the chapter to see the rest of the rules & regulations of More's Utopia.

• My view on More's Utopia is that there is no individualism. everyone is to much the same. I understand that More probably wanted it to be that way because he probably thinks that if everyone is the same, then there is no need for argument or for the communities to be divided for any reason. But in reality the world doesn't work like that. I think that Russell's comment when he writes 'Diversity is essential to happiness, & in More's Utopia there is hardly any', I think this comment really sum's it all up. Lastly I think that how can Utopia be perfect when they feed all children under the age of five, left over scraps at dinner time.

Erasmus

• Erasmus & Sir Thomas More serve as exemplars of the Northern Renaissance.
• Both despised scholastic Philosophy & were both witty, humorous & highly skilled writers.
• Erasmus (1466-1536) was born in Rotterdam & his father was a priest.
• His parents died before he was grown up, so his guardians forced him into becoming Monk at the monastery of Steyr.
• One of his guardians was a schoolmaster.
• In 1493, he became a Secretary to the bishop of Cambrai, who was Chancellor of the Golden Fleece. which gave him the opportunity to leave the Monastery to travel.
• He was an highly accomplished Latinist who admired the work of Lorenzo Valla, because of his book on the elegance of the Latin language.
• For a short time he studied at the University of Paris, but left because he didn't find anything to profit himself.
• Erasmus hated the scholastic, whom he thought to be superannuated & antiquated. He didn't really like any Philosophy, not even Plato or Aristotle.
• In 1499 he made his first visit to England.whilst in England he made friends with Colet & More. He then left England in the beginning of 1500.
•  He then set to work to learn Greek, then in 1506 he went to Italy but found that the Italians had nothing to teach him.
• He tried to learn Hebrew, but eventually gave it up.
• The only book by Erasmus that is still read, is called The praise of folly. He wrote it quickly in London, at the house of Sir Thomas More, to whom the book was dedicated to. In the book Popes, Cardinals & Bishops are fiercely ridiculed. He claims that they are 'brainsick fools', who have very little religion in them, yet are 'highly in love with themselves, & found admires or their own happiness'.
• On his second visit to England, he stayed for five years (1509-1514). Partly in London & partly in Cambridge.
• He wrote a book called Enchiridion Militis Christiani, to give advice to illiterate soldiers: they were to read the bible, but also Plato, Ambrose, Jerome & Augustine.
• He wrote a very successful book called Colloquies, to teach people how to talk in Latin about every-day matters, such as a game of bowls. This was very useful because Latin was the only international language & throughout western Europe, Latin may have been the only language that two students could use to converse.
• After the reformation Erasmus first lived in Louvain, then in Basel.
• In 1518 he published a satire called Julius exclusus, describing the failure of Julius II to go to heaven.

• From 1524 until his death he became increasingly unimportant. He lived to long into an age of new virtues & new vices-heroism & intolerance, neither of which he could acquire.

The Medici Family tree

Machiavelli

• Machiavelli (1467-1527) was a Florentine, whose father was a lawyer.
• Machiavelli obtained a minor post in the Florentine government (1498). He remained in the service of the Florentine government until the restoration of the Medici family in 1512. His role was to carry out important diplomatic missions.
• Once the Medici family took power, Machiavelli was arrested but then released & was allowed to live in retirement in the country near Florence.
• His most famous work was called The prince & was written in 1513. The book was dedicated to Lorenzo the second in an attempted to win over the Medici family, which failed. 
• The prince is concerned to discover how principalities are won, how they are held & how they are lost.  
• Machiavelli admired and had high praise for Caesar Borgia Because of the skillful way he went about things. Caesar Borgia had three main objectives after his father Alexander VI died. Those were as follows: Kill his brother. Conquer by force of arms & in the name of the Pope, territories which should of belonged to himself, not the Papal states, after his father died. Lastly to manipulate the collage of cardinals, so that the next Pope should become his friend. Machiavelli was impressed with the skillful & methodical way Caesar Borgia carried out these objectives & if it wasn't for the misfortune that he was to become ill, he would have most probably successfully completed these objectives. 
• However it must be said, Machiavelli's admiration for Caesar Borgia was only for his skill, not for his purposes.
• My thoughts on Machiavelli are that he comes across as a very smart man, because his time in employment in government made him very wise. He was able to observe what was going on around him & learn how to & how not to go about things, just from observing the people/leaders who were in higher positions than himself. So that's why his works titled The Prince & probably more successfully Discourses where so successful. However if his books were published today, they wouldn't be as successful because the methods used or needed to gain & sustain power in the world of today are completely different to how they were back then. 

Galileo

Notes on chapters 1-2

• The period of history known as 'modern', differs from that of the medival period.
  The two main ones are the diminishing authority of the church and the increasing authority of science.
• The culture is different in 'modern times'
• States replace the church which controls culture.
• The state has less influence on the opinions of philosophers than the church had in the middle ages
• Feudal aristocracy in the 15th century loses its political and economic importance. (replaced by kings)
• In the Renaissance, science played a very small part
• The 1st serious irruption of science was the publication of the Copernican Theory in 1543
  This theory was taken seriously when it was taken up and improved by Kepler and Galileo. (17th century)
• Unlike the body of Catholic dogma, science does not lay down a complete system, covering human morality, human hopes and the past and future history of the universe.
  It pronounces only on whatever, at the time, appears to have been scientifically ascertained.
• The pronouncements of science are made tentatively on the basis of probaility and are liable to modification.
• Theoretical science is and attempt to understand the world and Practical science is an attempt to change it.
• Galileo and Leonardo obtained government employment by their claim to improve artillery and the art of fortification.
• The triumph of science is mainly due to its practical utility.
• Until the 17th century, there was nothing of importance in philosophy.
• Modern philosophy has retained an individualistic and subjective tendancy.
• The five important States in Italy were Milan, Venice, Florence, the Papal Domain and Naples.
• The Medici family became rulers of Florence from around 1389 till 1737.
• During the Renaissance Florence was the most civilized city in the world.
• Alexander VI was the pope from (1492-1503) and was the father to the Duke of Gandia and more favourably Caesar Borgia. Together they conquered Romagna & Ancona. Caesar Borgia was known to have killed his brother but it was never confirmed or know as fact.
• France tried to invade Milan & Naples in 1502 with temporary success, but were ultimatley defeated by Spain. The spanish victory put an end to the Italian Renaissance.
• Cosimo & Lorenzo dei Medici were both addicted to Plato. Cosimo founded the Florentine Academy, which was dedicated to the study of Plato which Lorenzo continued.
Caesar Borgia
My thoughts on chapters 1-2 are that it seems to me that the Italian Renaissance was a breath of fresh air, in many ways for Italy. Because before the Renaissance, Italy was pretty much run by the church, which made people very much narrow minded. But when the Medici family came to power, because of there love for art, philosophy & Plato they incouraged people to think outside the box in a way. Also people like Michaelangelo, Galileo, leonardo & Descartes only helped to influence the movement which was the Renaissance.
Also the corruption of some of the popes in that erra, such as AlexanderVI didnt help the church to regain power. I also think that the increasing popularity of science helped the Renaissance & even though there was nothing of to much importance in Philosophy till the 17th century, the Renaissance was still the beggining of it in many ways & therfore held importance.   

Michaelangelo

This is me

Hi my name is Sean I am a Sports Studies and Journalism Studies Student at the university of winchester. I'll be updating my blog soon to let you know my thoughts on journalism as I learn it.